Iphones 17 and the Sugar Water Trap
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
stratechery.comTechstory
calmmixed
Debate
40/100
Iphone 17AppleTech Innovation
Key topics
Iphone 17
Apple
Tech Innovation
The article discusses the potential features of the iPhone 17, sparking a discussion on whether incremental updates are meaningful to consumers, with commenters questioning the significance of design changes versus functional improvements.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
11m
Peak period
2
28-30h
Avg / period
1.3
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 10, 2025 at 6:47 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 10, 2025 at 6:58 AM EDT
11m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
2 comments in 28-30h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 11, 2025 at 11:22 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45195850Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 6:10:34 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Sure, let's...
>There is a completely new body material and design
Which for most people is irrelevant. They care for functionality, not whether they device got it's nth different material or a slight look adjustment (any smartphone is still a rectangle slab of glass with cameras, not much to change anyway).
>There is a new faster chip, with GPUs actually designed for AI workloads (a reminder that Apple’s neural engine was designed for much more basic machine learning algorithms, not LLMs)
Still not interesting. AI on iOS is nowhere near that usefull atm.
>There is a 50% increase in RAM
Substantive. But who hit limits with the previous 8GB? A tiny handful of ultra-power users. So his point still stands.
>The front camera sensor has 2x the pixels, and is square
So what? A slightly better selfie and videocalls.
>The telephoto lense has 4x the pixels, allowing for 8x hardware zoom
And how often did a regular iPhone user say "I could really use an 8x hardware zoom"?
>There is a much larger battery, thanks to the Pro borrowing the Air’s trick of bundling all of the electronics in a larger yet more aesthetically pleasing plateau There is much better cooling, allowing for better sustained performance There is faster charging
Those 3 are good. The second not that interesting though - regular users didn't have any use for the 16 or even 15 level performance, it's not like the new "better sustained performance" will change their life.
So, basically, to the average smartphone user (not smartphone photography/video afficionado, and no power user running ultra demanding apps or games on their iPhone) it's basically: "slightly better cameras, if you're into that sort of thing, faster charging, and longer battery life".
Obviously not, hence we need tech as a substitute.
With that sorted out, the new iPhone it was a moderate update outside the interests of certain niches (ProRes RAW is hardly a household item).
Someone might have another phone (Android) and want to switch. Someone might have started making more money and want a nicer device. Etc.
Dislike of undue marketing hype aside, I don't really see the big deal about year over year upgrades not blowing the previous model away.
Sure, I've got complaints about consumerism, waste, etc, in general, but I feel like those are broader issues that might not be entirely orthogonal, but are still not the same issue.