Exploring Grid-Aware Websites
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
nicchan.meTechstory
calmmixed
Debate
60/100
SustainabilityWeb DevelopmentEnergy Efficiency
Key topics
Sustainability
Web Development
Energy Efficiency
The article explores the concept of 'grid-aware' websites that adjust their functionality based on the energy grid's current state, sparking a discussion on the potential benefits and drawbacks of this approach.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Moderate engagementFirst comment
1h
Peak period
6
0-2h
Avg / period
3.3
Comment distribution13 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 13 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 8, 2025 at 9:17 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 8, 2025 at 10:37 AM EDT
1h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
6 comments in 0-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 9, 2025 at 5:56 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45167887Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 5:28:51 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
To me the savings as mentioned in the article feel rather superficial compared to the energy consumed just getting the basic infra for this up & running. Somehow this feels like greenwashing.
I don't know a single worse offender for document size and performance than e-commerce. I've worked on a site that was unwittingly loading >1Gb of images on categories.
In terms of achieving the overall goal of "greening" the web, I would be very interested to see even some back-of-the-envelope math explaining how much energy this technique saves and how much of an impact that would have. Understanding the energy cost of webpages and massive edge rewriting serverless platforms like Cloudflare is unintuitive to me.
Cynically, my impression is that the overall approach is more like "greenwashing" than "greening" — at best I would guess it "raises awareness", with all of the implications to efficacy that such actions usually have. I followed the links through from the blog to The Green Web Foundation's FAQ [0] and did not find any tangible estimates of energy impact nor any attempts at measuring such an impact. The success metrics [1] they list do not include any measure of energy saved or understanding of the potential to save energy; rather, basically just attention.
[0] https://www.thegreenwebfoundation.org/tools/grid-aware-websi...
[1] https://www.thegreenwebfoundation.org/tools/grid-aware-websi...
1. This is about demand response (using less power during times of peak fossil fuel demand), while AI and crypto mostly affect base load.
2. Crypto and AI operators make too much money from their depreciating hardware to consider implementing demand response, but website operators would probably care less about externalizing the inconvenience of their demand response to their users and taking credit for the environmental win.
The only question left is "if you divide power usage from unnecessary JS execution by the difference between base and peak demand, is that ratio significant enough to warrant the extra SWE and infrastructure overhead?" To me, this feels like the kind of question to answer before even embarking on developing this kind of standard, so I'm sure the GAW AG can point me to an estimate of the total addressable impact. Right? Right?
As the global energy issues continue to rapidly unfold in both availability and costs more and more in time will be questioning that "thing" that nearly all take for granted absolute. A resource that is critical to modern life yet cannot be seen and therefore our vision driven species yields little concern for something that has always been readily available for one's entire life. When something is neglected and treated as infinite it is only a matter of time before such conflicts will ensue as a result of holistic mismanagement of an unseen resource that is very highly impacted by business 101 rules, supply and demand.
Glad to know of yet another that is cognizant of their code energy consumption. What most will balk at, some will even laugh, but this is just one's ignorance in lack of respect of time as those business principles take further grasp on reality of the situation where our technology progress has led us.
In my former life as an electrician I ran circuits that became the roads for those electrons to physically travel on. After becoming a software engineer I then logically controlled those same electrons from the circuits I pulled to power those devices. Many more in the future will be thinking both physically and logically about their own electron usage as the costs continue to rise given the undeniable reliance many still have on centralized power grid version 1 design per Morgan and Tesla.
I propose a more obviously user-beneficial application for this sort of graceful-degradation design: detect if the user's bandwidth is low, presenting a trimmed-down version if so to maintain a usable website. Too many sites these days are completely nonfunctional on slow (rural/patchy/etc.) connections with tens of MBs of scripts and frameworks.