Plastics-to-Syngas Photocatalysed by Co–ga2o3 Nanosheets
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govSciencestory
calmpositive
Debate
20/100
Plastic RecyclingSyngas ProductionPhotocatalysis
Key topics
Plastic Recycling
Syngas Production
Photocatalysis
A new method for converting plastics to syngas using Co–Ga2O3 nanosheets is discussed, with commenters exploring its potential and related ideas.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
1m
Peak period
2
0-1h
Avg / period
2
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 7, 2025 at 7:08 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 7, 2025 at 7:10 AM EDT
1m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
2 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 7, 2025 at 8:45 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45157154Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 6:02:51 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
https://mathstodon.xyz/@jamey@toot.cat/115162618544000037
That post says:
> I found an interesting paper about turning plastics into syngas. (Syngas is a mix of carbon monoxide and hydrogen that's useful for lots of things, including making various kinds of fuel, or even feeding to bacteria to make protein for food.)
> Their method works at normal pressure and temperature, in a reaction driven by sunlight. They made these special metal sheets that you can put in water with microplastics. Over a couple days, most of the plastic disappears. They tested PE plastic bags, PP plastic boxes and PET plastic bottles.
> And the way they made the sheets was basically "stir together these three chemicals you can buy online, heat, centrifuge, wash, and dry". It sounds maybe simple enough to try at home. Seems like a fun material to play with if the ingredients aren't too unsafe (I haven't checked safety yet).
> So I looked at how much actually buying those chemicals costs. It came to something like US$3,000 for the amount they made, which was less than a gram. Which no longer sounds quite so straightforward to try at home. I guess it's a catalyst, so it's not consumed by the reaction, but that's still a big investment as DIY projects go.
> Still a neat paper, though