Dumbing Down the Sat Bodes Poorly for Education
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
bloomberg.comOtherstory
calmnegative
Debate
40/100
EducationStandardized TestingSat
Key topics
Education
Standardized Testing
Sat
The article argues that recent changes to the SAT exam may have negative consequences for education, with commenters debating the implications of these changes.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
18s
Peak period
1
0-1h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 3, 2025 at 7:51 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 3, 2025 at 7:51 PM EDT
18s after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 4, 2025 at 3:55 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45121706Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 10:10:02 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
The Collegeboard did indeed adjust the test to better appeal to students, but this was primarily done by shortening the length of the exam from ~ 3 hours to ~2 hours. To compensate for this, the test was updated to an adaptive format to present students with more questions of appropriate difficulty levels based on their performance.
The other main change, which the article highlights, was to shorten the reading passages. Yes, there are skills no longer being tested because of this change, but it's also allowed for a broader array of passages to be included. The new version of the test introduced poetry and novel question types involving logical reasoning and use of data. Which of these skills are more important for success in college and future careers is a worthwhile question to ask, but not one with an obvious answer.