Garmin Unveils Fenix 8 Pro with Microled and Amoled Options

Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago

bundie

12 points

12 comments

neowin.netTechstory

skepticalmixed

Debate

60/100

SmartwatchesGarminWearable Technology

Key topics

Smartwatches

Garmin

Wearable Technology

Garmin has unveiled the Fenix 8 Pro smartwatch with MicroLED and AMOLED display options, featuring improved connectivity, but commenters are divided on its value and impact on battery life.

Snapshot generated from the HN discussion

Discussion Activity

Moderate engagement

First comment

13m

Peak period

84-96h

Avg / period

Comment distribution12 data points

Loading chart...

Based on 12 loaded comments

Key moments

01Story posted
Sep 3, 2025 at 1:36 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01
02First comment
Sep 3, 2025 at 1:50 PM EDT
13m after posting
Step 02
03Peak activity
8 comments in 84-96h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03
04Latest activity
Sep 8, 2025 at 11:46 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (12 comments)

Showing 12 comments

SilverElfin

4 months ago

4 replies

Seems like the main difference is actually not needing your phone for connectivity. It’ll hurt battery life. Good for emergencies but I doubt Garmin’s software can compete with Apple.

foxyv

4 months ago

1 reply

To be honest, the Apple watch isn't even in the same class as this watch. This is the kind of watch that people who are going to be traveling into the deep wilderness will wear instead of three other gadgets. It has a maximum battery life of 8 days, depth gauge, altimiter, barometer and a satellite communications module.

Edit: This would make a great watch for sailors to supplement an EPIRB.

s3p

4 months ago

1 reply

Garmin is also charging a premium, up to $2,000 it seems.

foxyv

4 months ago

Yeah, that's Garmin's thing. They are selling top of the line, marine/aviation grade, safety critical equipment. $2,000 is almost low for what they normally sell, like radar systems and chart plotters for boats, or glass cockpits for aircraft. They are mostly competing with Raytheon and BAE systems for niche applications. Stuff you would find in F-16 fighter jets except better somehow.

Essentially, Garmin is the product you buy when money is no object. Either because you are obscenely wealthy, or because you are trusting their product with your life and the lives of your passengers. They have some consumer grade stuff too that is usually trickling down from their obscenely expensive other businesses.

throwaway173738

4 months ago

1 reply

In Reach is basically 911 but in the backcountry. I don’t see how Apple can compete with that. Being able to contact emergency services without running back to a trailhead and driving to civilization is really powerful as an extra measure of safety.

mikestew

4 months ago

Apple already competes with satellite comms on the latest phones (well, anything after the 13?). It’s not as hands-off as InReach, but the job gets done. Rumors say the new AW Ultra will have satellite comms.

On top of that, T-Mobile has sat->cell now even for my iPhone 13. I tried the beta, it gets the job done and pretty seamlessly. It’s a monthly extra, so I’ll keep the InReach for now, but it’s time is limited.

Loic

4 months ago

Even my kids (full in the Apple ecosystem) are using Garmin watches because for sport, it looks like they are one level better than Apple. Especially the battery as they are often 48/72h without access to power.

izacus

4 months ago

The battery life is still humiliating Apple. The watch lasts 5-10 dats.

plqbfbv

4 months ago

1 reply

I was in the market for a new running watch recently, and was kinda disappointed no LTE options existed.

I'm very happy we're finally getting there, although pushing LTE down to the lower tier will take a while (I'm never going to buy a >1200$ smartwatch).

LTE support will kill battery life if online full day without doubt, but if Garmin plays it smart by limiting it to activity (with per-activity settings, e.g. a run may need an update every 3m, a trek maybe every 15m), sending periodic pings if out of BLE/Wifi range, and activating it only on user request for features, I could very happily live with 8 days of battery life (instead of 11) and LiveTrack support while I'm running, at least I don't need to carry >150g phone on my arm for 1h anymore.

mikestew

4 months ago

I had a 945LTE, and if I was out in the mountains where it couldn’t find a cell tower, it would burn the battery trying (the actual repro is a bit more complicated). Hopefully they manage the radio better in the Fenix version, or say hello to Apple Watch battery life.

AshamedCaptain

4 months ago

Disappointment, as they're dropping the plain LCD options (30+ battery life and ridiculously high visibility on daylight) all while doubling the price. They can keep it for themselves...

bobmcnamara

4 months ago

Manufacturer announcement: https://www.garmin.com/en-US/newsroom/press-release/wearable...

View full discussion on Hacker News

ID: 45118469Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 7:45:36 PM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.

Open link View on HN