GenAI Misinformation, Trust, and News Consumption – Evidence from a Field Experiment
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
Original: GenAI Misinformation, Trust, & News Consumption-Evidence from a Field Experiment
nber.orgResearchstory
informativeneutral
Debate
20/100
AI ResearchNewsTrust in Media
Key topics
AI Research
News
Trust in Media
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
7d
Peak period
1
156-168h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Aug 29, 2025 at 1:18 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 5, 2025 at 5:40 AM EDT
7d after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 156-168h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 5, 2025 at 5:40 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45066836Type: storyLast synced: 11/18/2025, 12:16:33 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
I’ve been working on something along those lines: a platform where every post carries a credibility score. Instead of likes or shares, users support or refute posts with sources, and credibility updates across posts, users, and publishers in real time. The idea is to create a platform that is better suited to finding the truth than the other popularity-based algorithmic platforms.
It’s here if anyone wants to take a look: https://noblenews.io
I’d be especially curious how HN readers think a system like this could be gamed or biased — and whether surfacing credibility scores actually helps trust, or just shifts the problem somewhere else.