Measuring LLM Citations with Server Logs Might Not Work as Assumed
Posted4 months ago
agentberlin.aiTech Discussionstory
informativeneutral
Debate
40/100
LLMServer LogsWeb CrawlingContent Caching
Key topics
LLM
Server Logs
Web Crawling
Content Caching
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
N/A
Peak period
1
Start
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Aug 28, 2025 at 1:08 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Aug 28, 2025 at 1:08 PM EDT
0s after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in Start
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Aug 28, 2025 at 1:08 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45054542Type: storyLast synced: 11/18/2025, 12:13:00 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
We ran this on Vercel/Next.js middleware (before the edge cache) to rule out local caching—browser requests log normally, but many citations never appear.
This doesn’t mean measurement is impossible, but the “citation = visit” assumption doesn’t always hold. Curious if others have observed similar patterns.