Absence of Evidence Is Evidence of Absence; It Just Isn't Proof
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
svpow.comTech Discussionstory
informativeneutral
Debate
40/100
EpistemologyLogicProblem-Solving
Key topics
Epistemology
Logic
Problem-Solving
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
13m
Peak period
1
0-1h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Aug 28, 2025 at 7:35 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Aug 28, 2025 at 7:48 AM EDT
13m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Aug 28, 2025 at 7:48 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45050909Type: storyLast synced: 11/18/2025, 12:12:11 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
> Evidence (noun): the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
Absence of evidence doesn't increase your available body of facts that can validate a proposition. That's the gist of the saying.
The classic example is sampling one bucket of water from the ocean, and declaring there is no life in the oceans, because there is no life in your bucket.