Programming People (2016)
Posted5 months agoActive4 months ago
leftoversalad.comTechstory
calmpositive
Debate
20/100
Programming LanguagesLanguage DesignSoftware Development
Key topics
Programming Languages
Language Design
Software Development
The article 'Programming People' personifies various programming languages, sparking a discussion on the characteristics and quirks of different languages among HN users.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Active discussionFirst comment
3h
Peak period
12
6-12h
Avg / period
4.8
Comment distribution19 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 19 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Aug 23, 2025 at 11:09 PM EDT
5 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Aug 24, 2025 at 2:00 AM EDT
3h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
12 comments in 6-12h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Aug 26, 2025 at 12:14 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45000988Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 4:11:17 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Likewise PHP has been somewhat inconsistent historically and carries its own legacy quirks—but it's JS that gets mocked, because why?
Meanwhile Java—although designed with a cohesive strict, statically typed, object-oriented sensibility—has seen fit to add lambda expressions, stream APIs, record types, and pattern matching, following some of the same trends as ECMA TC39.
So, when it comes to developer ergonomics—which, I daresay, is the subject of this satire and the preeminent aspect of a language most hotly debated—does JS really deserve the hate? There must be some other current of thought—some dark matter—warping the discourse.
I agree with you about the rest :)
(Sorry, could not resist...)
Its not even heavy anymore because its just the OS native webview, unlike electron, it doesn't bundle a browser so the base app is just 3.3MB, while if I use GPU to render the Ui the app I ship starts at 60MB
Shows that the "brand" of a programming language doesn't just depend on the language itself but also on what projects are using the language.
Same with Objective-C, which is technically a general-purpose language from the C family, with a history that predates the iPhone by decades - but is nevertheless basically "the iOS app language" today.