Grok Chats Exposed in Google Results
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
bbc.comTechstory
skepticalnegative
Debate
40/100
Data PrivacySearch EnginesSocial Media
Key topics
Data Privacy
Search Engines
Social Media
Grok chats are being exposed in Google search results, raising concerns about data privacy, and the HN community questions the responsibility of Google and X in this matter.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
35m
Peak period
3
0-2h
Avg / period
1.6
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Aug 22, 2025 at 3:23 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Aug 22, 2025 at 3:58 AM EDT
35m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
3 comments in 0-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Aug 23, 2025 at 5:29 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 44981829Type: storyLast synced: 11/18/2025, 1:47:10 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Seems a bit upside down. Should they not approach Google for comment? If a stolen watch turns up at a carbooth sale, I'd in the first place want answers from the seller, not the victim.
Search results indexed from the public web aren't stolen.
Private material exposed on the public web in contravention of the privacy expectation between the user to whom it belongs and the site owner with custody is a problem of the site owner exposing it, not the search engine indexing it.
I'd be surprised x.ai freely aided a direct rival.
Even if you somehow got an unpublished chat link, their robots.txt disallows crawling it.
https://web.archive.org/web/20250701004836/https://grok.com/...
No, I explicitly said that the problem was the site owner (X/xAI) exposing private data to the public web, not an end user issue.
> How else would they be on the public web?
The most obvious way data users expect to be private that is in the custody of xAI and/or X (not really sure on exactly the division of responsibility between those two when it comes to Grok chats) would be available on the public web is one of those two companies fucking up and making it available publicly rather than restricting accesss. It something there are rrgular news items about firms with custody of data that should be peivate doing, and it is explicitly what I said upthread. Not sure where you got your elaborate Rube Goldberg scenario involving everyone other than the site owner with custody of the data.
> I'd be surprised x.ai freely aided a direct rival.
Yeah, direct aid to Google would be a lot weirder than them just fucking up privacy, which indirectly gets it on Google because Google crawls the public web.
Anyone with that link will be able to get that chat.
It does not mean users pasted them on HN or some other public website. People often are not aware services they use crawl their data. Links in your personal hosted mail, or IMs will most often end up in the associated provider's search index. They are publicly accesible links after all.
Additionally, grok.com's robots.txt explicitly disallows crawlers from accessing these specific chat links as they are under grok.com/chat/, but it allows explicitly published chats by the user as those are made available under grok.com/share/
Now I know many users of these mail and chat services are not aware that when they mail or chat a link, even just with themselves, they are giving that link to the search crawler/indexer. There lies IMHO the root of the problem.
What is your take? Should grok, as well as all the other ai chat providers, remove the 'share this chat publicly' functionality? Should providers such as Google, Meta and Microsoft not index links from mails and chats?
Personally, I think the latter makes more sense.