2002: Last.fm and Audioscrobbler Herald the Social Web
Key topics
The nostalgia is palpable as users reminisce about Last.fm and Audioscrobbler's pioneering role in shaping the social web back in 2002. As commenters dig up Richard Jones, the mastermind behind Audioscrobbler, they're delighted to find he's still active online, with a witty bio that sparks curiosity about his "BEAM-appreciator" label, which is cleverly decoded as a nod to the Erlang VM. Meanwhile, a wave of users proudly share their scrobbling milestones, revealing a loyal community that's been tracking their music listens for nearly two decades, with sign-up dates clustering around 2004-2007. It's a heartwarming testament to the platform's enduring legacy.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
9m
Peak period
120
0-12h
Avg / period
28.6
Based on 143 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Dec 14, 2025 at 4:05 PM EST
22 days ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Dec 14, 2025 at 4:13 PM EST
9m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
120 comments in 0-12h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Dec 20, 2025 at 5:16 AM EST
16 days ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
https://bsky.app/profile/metabrew.com
Anyway I loved that he has reposted a post from musicbraniz https://bsky.app/profile/musicbrainz.org/post/3lnhvp23jc22l/...
My usage went way up once I was able to properly scrobble listens played via my hifi.
In my defence, it was only recently that you could sensibly scrobble from iOS with Marvis and I gave up on Spotify countless years ago.
I initially moved to it because Shortcuts broke my "generate 2h of music I rarely listen to" shortcut (it stopped being able to add music to playlists - hilarious for an in-house app talking to an in-house app!) and someone suggested Marvis because it has a "dynamic smart playlist" and it also has integrated scrobbling.
You can pretty much replace the Apple Music frontend with Marvis (at least on iOS) and everything works the same (because it's still using Music as its backend.)
Breaking free from their recommendation algorithm and dedicating time to discovering music has been a transformative experience.
I am delighted that numerous tools still utilize scrobbling. My favorite recent discovery is Tapmusic. [0]
[0] https://www.tapmusic.net/
My 16yo son discovered Last.fm and scrobblibg and got me to install the Jellyfin scrobbler plugin. And I recovered my old account! I got some boomer music jokes from him, but it was worth it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oink%27s_Pink_Palace
Next thursday, RED will have been around longer than WCD...
Check out tapmusic.net too to make cool diagrams out of your scrobbled music.
Then again, if all it does is collages, then ListenBrainz has a tool for that of its own.
Maybe not super useful, but fun ;) when at home, I scrobble to MS which distributes the data, when I have no VPN active on the go, I scrobble to last.fm only, which then gets used as source by MS as well, to redistribute it to the others.
[0] https://github.com/FoxxMD/multi-scrobbler
[1] https://github.com/gabehf/Koito/
If you use Spotify, you can download your full listening history here: https://www.spotify.com/us/account/privacy/. You get it in a pretty convenient JSON format and with a little bit of code it's pretty easy to create some visualizations.
There are also websites for visualizing this data. I'm quite fond of this one: https://explorify.link/. It allows you to do some custom queries.
Note that apps built from the SDK don't have access to the full history, only up to some cutoff. I tried a couple over the years and wrongly concluded Spotify deleted your history after some time.
The data download does contain everything, which was a very pleasant surprise. I didn't think I'd ever see the data from the couple years gap in my last.fm.
There's probably one person nursing some horrific bogslop software that frequently breaks but absolutely cannot be rewritten or changed (because it was someone's pet project) and frequently has to be manually twizzled to get things out of what is probably a hostile data retrieval environment and they're just TIRED and that's why there's a 30 day leeway because otherwise the Data Retrieval Goblin would be way over the line of overwhelmed rather than just under it all the time.
Probably.
(I realise I've likely described a significant percentage of companies there.)
It was just such a convoluted mess. They promised you could upload all your music and it would be there forever, they said! Bastards...
Spotify is still the only big streaming service with native platform-level scrobbling. For everything else it's a lot more DIY, usually with third party tools at the device level.
A big reason it’s still relevant is the ecosystem around it. The API hasn't really changed in 15 years, which makes it easy to build tools where a username alone is enough. That kind of lightweight social integration has mostly disappeared elsewhere.
Today, the social / community side is almost entirely just Discord. Nearly every music related server has a bot that displays Last.fm stats. My estimate is that abut 10% of Last.fm their users are also active in Discord music communities.
(Disclaimer: I run .fmbot, a Discord bot that integrates with Last.fm.)
That's not true. It's missing from Apple Music but present in Tidal, Deezer, and Quobuz. It also works well with Plex.
A large list from them: https://support.last.fm/t/more-ways-to-scrobble/192
The Plex integration gets pretty close to native, but it only scrobbles after a track is done, it doesn't have 'Now Playing' support.
As for Deezer and Quobuz I'm not sure. Afaik Spotify still stands alone by being set-and-forget, working on any device and having full feature support.
Also thanks for your work, while I dislike the spammyness of it, that's on the server owners (main server I'm on limits it to one bot channel)
As for spammyness, I'm aware this is an issue. For non-bot channels I recommend using .togglecommand and enabling just a few specific commands, and setting a small embed mode so .fm commands don't take up too much space in chat.
The worst was Pandora, which did recommendations based on breakdown of musical instruments and elements in the song. It did what it aimed to do pretty well, only it was a bad idea. It gave you a lot of uninspiring music that sounded like a bland copy of something you actually liked.
Spotify's recommendations are not super awful, but definitely feel closer to Pandora's style. I wonder why is the result like that even though I'm sure they train their model based on listening history.
The album chart queries are also incredible. The site has a very detailed system of genres and descriptors so you can find exactly what you want.
simple, very little time investment required and avoids most modern fuckery
My problem with this is that it makes certain assumptions about the consistency of applying genres and about the very concept of genre which (imo) is more of a social construct than an empirical concept.
I'm just wondering how a strong community like that was struck a deathblow. It's not like all that content disappeared.
I would say all other media (or at least, the media I care about - film, tv, books) has what.cd equivalents, sometimes multiple. I think Spotify and AM killed 95%+ of “true” private tracker interest for music, especially with lossless and surround releases being available. The diehard core are still there (names from 15 years ago are still active) but it’s really not the same.
Granted you can set up automated *arr systems with PLEXAMP to get a pretty seamless "personal Spotify" setup IME getting true usefulness out of trackers of What's quality always required spending real money - to obtain rare records/CDs on marketplaces - or at least large amounts of time if you went the "rent CDs from the library" route. I personally haven't ran into much RYM releases lacking on Apple Music and what is lacking I can find on Bandcamp or YouTube.
You can even save their top songs as an auto-updating playlist. It's a great way to find new music that is not controlled by algorithms.
Here's my profile if anyone wants to have a look at: https://volt.fm/soheilpro
This has been until very recently the modus operandi of most recommendation engine algorithms. If an algorithm is essentially doing what you do, would you not like that?
I really liked their original profile pages that had sort of a MySpace style customization & vibe. You could have your favorite musicians and tracks analyzed through their API by these 3rd party services that would create very cool graphics & charts to show off to friends and visitors what you were into.
But, then I guess they ran out of money and were really trying to get scooped up by Spotify. They turned off their music player, disabled all the profile customization, alternative services quit having built in scrobbling to it.
I remember I had to download an app that would constantly have my microphone open and it would ID the song I was listening to via some kind of Shazam service and send it to last.fm. I never considered what a security risk that was because I was more interested in keeping my last.fm music tracked.
”If take human out … why human there no more???”
This is our species.
See what your friends are listening to, develop communities around shared musical interests, get better recommendations. Sort of like YouTube now.
A bit late to the party.
It's now all but dead, probably because with apple getting a monthly cut with Apple Music either way, there's no incentive to maintain such a system.
My favorite thing about Napster and LimeWire was when you could find a song, and then BROWSE the hard drive of the person hosting that song. It was so interesting to find house music and be digging through the tastes of someone in London. And, then chatting with them, and discovering the live scenes, the people behind the music, etc. I loved that and nothing has ever replaced it.
Having said all this, I am interested in playing with "scrobbling." Anyone have any advice on how to get started? Do you need a music library? Is there a way to import your playlists from YouTube music? I'm not a spotify person.
Soulseek lets you do this and is still going
Beyond that, and practically speaking, I find it the easiest way to find large, nicely organized discographies. And some not so nicely organized.
Someone clearly didn't listen to John Peel and Andy Kershaw in their youth.
(also, IN MY DAY, it was generally somebody else selecting the music for you - radio DJs/programmers, TV music shows, availability of things in shops, being able to actually get to the damn shops, etc. None of this choose your own adventure streaming or digital music malarkey.)
It feels to me like "dark mode" (which is a merely single color of customization for an app). We expect so little from our software and services that even these little, previously common features are supposed to be a treat.
Anyway, Last.fm was great -- I never used it that much for discovery, but rather to get insight into what I was listening to. Largely, it didn't say THAT much about my habits because I mostly just listened to my collection on random. My top bands were, for the most part, the bands I had the most of.
Eventually the stats became live updating and a bit of fun was lost.
Skill issue. you can export your listening history whenever you like.
I made friends I still have by browsing people who had a compatible music taste to me.
I also use the following docker containers on my home server:
Multi-Scrobbler: https://hub.docker.com/r/foxxmd/multi-scrobbler Koito: https://koito.io/guides/installation/
This allows me to share my last.fm input to both a local scrobbler (Koito) and to listenbrainz - I figured having this data in multiple locations makes it a bit more safe.
Honestly between last.fm and listenbrainz I find myself exploring more on listenbrainz - even though most of it's users don't really fit the same listening profile I do.
Comparison of listeners really nails the recommendations. Similar minds like to listen to similar things.
0: https://github.com/vjeranc/cmus-status-scrobbler
When I used to be much more active in online music communities I would post a 9x9 of my most listened to albums of the past week and discuss them.
chatGPT is incredible, just giving it a single song and some context, it can recommend at a rate of something like 85-90%.
the only place i’ve gotten the BEST music recommendations were the oink and last.fm forums. humans, still, are the best recommendation infrastructure.
It caused me to not make the code public until I can ship it with an allowlist. It's almost done but I got distracted
If you need a scrobbler for Android (and Linux) I recommend Pano Scrobbler: https://github.com/kawaiiDango/pano-scrobbler
very interesting article!
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/9d/f9/19/08ac5ef...
Here is part of the story on my website… I’ll write it up better one of these days:
https://www.whiteis.com/similarities-engine
Yeah yeah it was a software patent. If that bugs you, you can take solace in the fact that I blew it executing on monetizing it. Microsoft ended up owning it and I went on to other adventures.
Here’s a list of the 456 US Patents that cite the Similarities Engine patent as prior art: https://www.whiteis.com/cites-to-se-patent
The thing with data is that you have to act on it for it not to be a waste. This data is useful only to recommendation engineers. Spotify's end-of-year summary is more than enough to satisfy my curiosity.