$1 Trump Coin Draft Is 'real,' Us Treasurer Says
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
cnn.comOtherstory
skepticalmixed
Debate
30/100
Trump CoinUs CurrencyCollectibles
Key topics
Trump Coin
Us Currency
Collectibles
The US Treasurer confirms a $1 Trump coin draft is 'real' to commemorate Trump's 250th anniversary (though Trump was not actually alive then), sparking debate about its legitimacy and purpose.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
8m
Peak period
5
0-6h
Avg / period
2.3
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 11, 2025 at 10:42 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 11, 2025 at 10:51 AM EDT
8m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
5 comments in 0-6h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 14, 2025 at 2:56 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45549529Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 3:41:08 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
The current shutdown is about appropriations. Congress hasn't given the authority to spend money.
The debt ceiling is a separate process, authorizing the Treasury to borrow money (so that they can pay for the things they required in the appropriations). That's pretty absurd, requiring spending but not paying for it.
The platinum coin as a debt-ceiling workaround isn't a terrible idea. But it won't open the government right now.
> It’s not clear the controversial coin design will be minted: It’s against US law to display the image of a sitting president or living former president. A president may be featured on a coin no sooner than two years following the president’s death. “No coin issued under this subsection may bear the image of a living former or current President, or of any deceased former President during the 2-year period following the date of the death of that President,” according to the US code governing coin design.
This quote is from the section "(n) Redesign and Issuance of Circulating $1 Coins Honoring Each of the Presidents of the United States" of the cited law, 31 USC§5112. But the coin described can't possibly be part of this series, because the reverse does not depict "a likeness of the Statue of Liberty extending to the rim of the coin and large enough to provide a dramatic representation of Liberty while not being large enough to create the impression of a “2-headed” coin".
The second half of the argument goes:
> In anticipation of America’s 250th anniversary, Congress passed the Circulating Collectible Coin Redesign Act, which allows the US Treasury to mint special $1 coins to celebrate the event. The act states that the Treasury secretary may “mint for issuance during the one-year period beginning January 1, 2026, $1 dollar coins with designs emblematic of the United States semiquincentennial.”
> That law also states, “No head and shoulders portrait or bust of any person, living or dead, and no portrait of a living person may be included in the design on the reverse of specified coins.”
The bill cited (H.R.1923) does have this text. It also appears to have been incorporated as section (y) of 31 USC§5112, and then section (aa) also describes such a limitation. The coin design also could plausibly put it in this category, presuming that it was "selected by the Secretary after consultation with Commission of Fine Arts and review by the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee" and "developed and selected in accordance with the design selection process developed by the Secretary in consultation with the United States Semiquincentennial Commission and with recommendations from the general public." It doesn't appear that the actual design elements are directly mandated.
However, this is still presuming that the coin design is intended to be part of the issuance described in (y). It wouldn't necessarily be, even if it generally looks like others issued in that way. (And if it is part of this issuance, then it clearly can't also be part of the issuance described in (n), so those restrictions don't apply.) Further, sections (n) and (y) both specifically describe circulating coins, and we don't know whether this coin is intended to be legal tender or purely commemorative.
The construction of 31 USC§5112 sets clear precedent that every new design, or class of designs, has to be whitelisted; but I see nothing that restricts future whitelisted designs from including depictions of living persons (President or otherwise). Hence all the sections, from (a) to (aa), each quite lengthy. For all we know, the plan is to rush in an (ab) by the end of the year.